Due process
439
MENTIONS
76
EPISODES
67
PODCASTS
Search complete. 439 mentions across 76 episodes found for "Due process".
Sep 29, 2026
Ep 9: Primetime
E
26:02Emily MiragliaHOST
You're seeing it at its most successful.
E
26:04Emily MiragliaHOST
You're seeing that clearly they've gotten past the point of like no sort of due process.
E
26:10Emily MiragliaHOST
Not only one to like actually legally properly catch these guys.
E
26:14Emily MiragliaHOST
How is this legal? But also bringing new people on and having them quite literally be thrown to the wolves.
6 MINS LATER
E
32:09Emily MiragliaHOST
interesting.
E
32:10Emily MiragliaHOST
But that's unfortunately like ultimately why this show ended up stopping when it did.
E
32:16Emily MiragliaHOST
They were not doing due process.
E
32:19Emily MiragliaHOST
So sting operations have been a thing for a long time and continue to be.
Episode 1428: Reading 'The Nuremberg System' w/ Thomas777 - Part 4
P
28:36Pete QuiñonesHOST
Going to continue.
P
28:38Pete QuiñonesHOST
The International Military Tribunal, which sat between the 20th of November 1945 and the 1st of October 1946, was a singularly ideological enterprise couched in the appearance, though not the substance, of due process of law.
P
28:54Pete QuiñonesHOST
It did not aspire to anything other than to condemn the German Reich as a criminal actor to declare, according to its own novel interpretations of rules of evidence, discovery protocol, and due process, the government and armed forces of the German Reich to constitute an ongoing and co-hate criminal conspiracy.
P
29:13Pete QuiñonesHOST
The objective of the proceedings was to characterize by way of various offers of proof buttressed by a heavily reliance on pre-existing conceptual prejudices held by the judges so impaneled as trier of both fact and law.
P
29:30Pete QuiñonesHOST
and facilitated by a prevailing spirit of vengeance, the raison d'etre, the entire rationale for the existence of the National Socialist Party state, as a conspiracy to carry out the mass homicide of the Jewish people on a planetary scale, and to capture, dominate, and exploit by way of ruthless conquest of Lebensraum, and the acquisition of military means adequate to neutralize any actual or potential strategic rival or competitor by developing and permanent mobilization of military resources sufficient to project power across the entirety of the planet.
161 | The Manchester City Verdict: A Stain On The Premier League
J
18:21John BrewinHOST
had.Yeah. Let's quote a bit of Khaldoon, shall we? "There are so many things I would like to be able to share with you to help you understand why we feel so confident in our position, but the strict confidentiality of the legal process and our determination to respect it means I cannot do that at the moment.
J
18:40John BrewinHOST
Even this letter underwent se- several legal checks to make sure it complies." Now, that followed a, a statement released by a spokesman to a number of publications on Friday, and, uh, this included, it, it's saying, including, they said, "The club has diligently respected due process for eight years on the basis that the Premier League board and executive would behave as an independent, impartial and fair-minded regulator, free from partisan influence." To my reading, there's one hell of an inference there, isn't there? They're, they're, they're pointing at something, aren't they? And, and, and this is the thing.
J
19:20John BrewinHOST
As you said, Tarik, the, the Premier League are aware that they, are, are pr- Manchester City and their legal team are prepared to use several angles to overturn the process, make sure that they're not found guilty.
M
19:33Miguel DelaneyGUEST
Well, look, it came up in, um, in the CAS case, didn't it? Or sorry, not the CAS case, the UEFA case.
Mega Edition: Alan Dershowitz Offers Kohberger Some Unsolicited Legal Advice (9/28/26)
B
1:42Bobby CapucciHOST
But what we have saw from the authorities is damning as hell.
B
1:47Bobby CapucciHOST
And while everyone has a right to due process, the evidence that has been presented is so strong that it's very difficult to try and understand or wrap your mind around what sort of plausible defense he thinks he's going to come up with.
B
2:04Bobby CapucciHOST
When the probable cause affidavit for the arrest of Brian Koberger was unsealed on January 5th, legal experts told Law and Crime that they believed it contained several bad facts for the defendant, including DNA evidence linking him to the grisly scene.
B
2:20Bobby CapucciHOST
And we're going to talk more about DNA later on in another episode and how it's the gold standard of science, but it's not infallible.
28 MINS LATER
B
30:52Bobby CapucciHOST
The victims were seniors Kaylee Gonsalves and Madison Mogan, both 21, and junior Zanna Kernodel and freshman Ethan Chapin, both 20.
B
31:01Bobby CapucciHOST
The three women rented the off-campus house in Moscow, where they were stabbed to death while Chapin was staying the night with Kernodle, his girlfriend.
B
31:09Bobby CapucciHOST
Koberger's defense, led by public defender Ann Taylor, objected and argued that judges' decision to stop their community survey work before a court hearing violated Koberger's rights under the 14th Amendment, guaranteeing due process.
B
31:23Bobby CapucciHOST
Judge, he did at points, rejected the allegation.
Law and Disorder September 28, 2026
J
15:52James LoefflerGUEST
And by people, I mean administration officials.
J
15:55James LoefflerGUEST
The other thing that's happened, of course, is that the selectivity has extended to a lack of due process.
J
16:01James LoefflerGUEST
Every case I'm talking about in my book and in the long history of the debates and conflicts over free speech and antisemitism in America, every case had lawyers and courts involved.
J
16:13James LoefflerGUEST
working through and debating these issues about permits, about appeals, about legal procedure, civil liberties and civil rights.
J
16:22James LoefflerGUEST
All these things were involved.
J
16:24James LoefflerGUEST
By contrast, we're in a moment where by fiat and by policies that simply dispense with due process, the administration has said we're going to somehow tackle this one version of anti-Semitic hatred.
J
16:37James LoefflerGUEST
We've seen the consequences.
J
16:38James LoefflerGUEST
They're really dire.
Where Is Lance Twiggs? Who Is Lance Twiggs? Why Has LUNA Been Forgotten? FOLLOW THE MONEY
L
74:33LionelHOST
She just may be the epicenter of this, but it's about Tyler Robinson.
L
74:36LionelHOST
It's about due process.
L
74:38LionelHOST
It's about facts of the case.
L
74:40LionelHOST
It's about proving anything.
USCA, D.C. Circuit J.G.G. v. Trump, Case No. 26-5074
N
9:58Neomi RaoPANELIST
But they still would have the opportunity to seek asylum, even if they can't guarantee that they would get asylum.
N
10:05Neomi RaoPANELIST
And, you know, the Supreme Court has recognized that these folks have, when they were here, some due process rights attached to their, you know, to their detention.
H
10:17Harry T. EdwardsPANELIST
Yeah, the question at issue is the absence of due process rights.
H
10:22Harry T. EdwardsPANELIST
And as I read the case law, it's absolutely clear they have a right to raise that.
H
10:26Harry T. EdwardsPANELIST
This is not an entry case where they're seeking initial entry.
H
14:26Harry T. EdwardsPANELIST
It's inconsistent with Supreme Court law.
H
14:28Harry T. EdwardsPANELIST
Whether or not Garcia deals with that specifically, there are all the cases, like Maize and others, which recognizes the distinction between...
H
14:37Harry T. EdwardsPANELIST
Maize says, it's true that aliens who once passed through our gates, even illegally... may be expelled only after proceedings conforming to the traditional standards of fairness encompassed in due process of the law.
USCA, Fifth Circuit Rodriguez v. Ortega, Case No. 26-50183
D
1:12Drew EnsignGUEST
But plaintiffs instead claim that because they successfully made it past the border, which is to say they successfully committed the crime of illegal entry, they have acquired a constitutional entitlement to bond hearings by virtue of that illegal entry.
D
1:27Drew EnsignGUEST
and the panel erroneously adopted that theory in part, holding the due process clause mandated bond hearings once 90 days had passed.
D
1:35Drew EnsignGUEST
Pointiff's arguments and the panel's opinions rest on two fundamental errors, each of which requires reversal here.
D
1:43Drew EnsignGUEST
First, the panel erroneously treated pointiff's claims as sounding in procedural due process rather than substantive due process.
D
1:51Drew EnsignGUEST
Here, as a matter of substantive policy, Congress decided to mandate detention regardless of life risk or dangerousness.
D
1:58Drew EnsignGUEST
The only relevant factual question here is whether or not plaintiffs are applicants for admission, which they concede that they are.
D
2:06Drew EnsignGUEST
As the Supreme Court's decision in Connecticut DPS therefore makes clear, a hearing on flight risk or dangerousness in this context would thus be a bootless exercise that procedural due process simply cannot compel.
D
2:18Drew EnsignGUEST
It would be the equivalent of a 14-year-old plaintiff demanding a hearing on whether or not they're a safe driver to get a driver's license, something that could only be accomplished by overcoming the substantive policy choice of the legislature to restrict driver's licenses to those 16 and above.
“We have a cult party" in the majority: Rep. Jayapal calls out Trump’s lack of accountability
J
25:17Jacob SoboroffHOST
They were held for months inside that notorious Sakat mega prison.
J
25:22Jacob SoboroffHOST
Now, a court is weighing whether or not they are still entitled to due process.
J
25:27Jacob SoboroffHOST
That's coming up next.
S
25:37speaker_13ADVERTISER
That sound costs you customers every single day.
J
29:41Jacob SoboroffHOST
And yet they spent months there.
J
29:43Jacob SoboroffHOST
They spent months there without access to either the Salvadoran or American justice systems until they were eventually released and sent to Venezuela as part of a prisoner swap back in July of last year.
J
29:55Jacob SoboroffHOST
But now, now there is a panel of judges that is deciding whether these men will finally get due process after League Alert of the ACLU argued this week that American law should guarantee each of these men to have the chance to challenge their removal and the accusations made against them.
J
30:13Jacob SoboroffHOST
Legal Learner joins me now.
Absolute Parens Patriae
M
1:34Mary CooganHOST
Why Prince v. Massachusetts limited parental rights, 1944.
M
1:41Mary CooganHOST
How In re Gault, 1967, gave kids due process rights.
M
1:47Mary CooganHOST
Key rulings, Addington, Santoski, and Troxell explained.
M
1:53Mary CooganHOST
How states use it to sue attorneys general for the public.
S
6:51speaker_2NARRATOR
Parents may be free to become martyrs themselves, but it does not follow they are free to make martyrs of their children.
S
7:00speaker_2NARRATOR
In short, parental rights are real, but they are not absolute.
S
7:04speaker_2NARRATOR
Due process comes to juvenile court.
S
7:08speaker_2NARRATOR
Then came the reckoning for juvenile courts.
66 more episodes mention Due process.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.