Defendant

Fined twenty-one shillings.

perth sheriff court before sheriff sim david mitchell charged with poaching there were two previous convictions the last being three years ago the sheriff was asked to deal leniently with mitchell who was sixty-two years of age and who offered no resistance to the gamekeeper four months dundee sheriff court before hon sheriff substitute r c walker john murray donald craig and james parkes charged with poaching craig and parkes find one pound each or fourteen days murray five pounds or one month reading borough police court before messrs w b monk f b parfit h m wallis and g gilligan alfred masters aged sixteen charged with sleeping out on a waste piece of ground and having no visible means of subsistence seven days salisbury city petty sessions before the mayor messrs c hoskins g fulford e alexander and w marlowe james moore charged with stealing a pair of boots from outside a shop twenty-one days horncastle police court before the rev w f massingbird the rev j graham and mr n lucas calcraft george brackenbury a young labourer convicted of what the magistrates characterised as an altogether unprovoked and brutal assault upon james serjeant foster a man over seventy years of age fined one pound and five shillings and sixpence costs workshop petty sessions before messrs f j s foljam r edison and s smith john priestley charged with assaulting the rev leslie graham defendant who was drunk was wheeling a perambulator and pushed it in front of a lorry with the result that the perambulator was overturned and the baby in it thrown out the lorry passed over the perambulator but the baby was uninjured Defendant then attacked the driver of the lorry, and afterwards assaulted the complainant, who remonstrated with him upon his conduct.

In consequence of the injuries defendant inflicted, complainant had to consult a doctor.

Find forty shillings and costs.

I don't have any evidence one way or the other.

The next document we have is the State's Response to the Defendant's Second Supplemental Request for Discovery.

State of Idaho, plaintiff, versus Bryan Christopher Kohberger, the defendant.

To the defendant, Bryan Christopher Kohberger, and counsel Ann Taylor.

Comes now the State of Idaho by and through the Latah County Prosecuting Attorney, and submits the following response to defendant's second supplemental request for discovery.

The State incorporates its January 23rd, 2023 State's Response to Request for Discovery and February 21st, 2023 State's Response to Defendant's First Supplemental Request for Discovery as if fully set forth at this point.

The State has and will continue to provide discovery in accordance with Idaho Criminal Rule 16 and applicable law.

This was dated the 29th of March of 2023, and it was signed by William W. Thompson Jr.

Reporting in San Bernardino-

Defendant was found guilty of all four counts of first-degree murder.

The first count was the murder of Joseph.

The second count was the murder of Summer.

As is clear, Epstein's conduct against plaintiff constituted gender-motivated violence, which resulted in severe and protracted pain and suffering for plaintiffs.

Defendant Frederick Fakai and his entity, Frederick Fakai and Company, LLC, and his employee, Patrick Coombs, played critical roles in enabling and conspiring with Epstein to commit acts of gender-motivated violence against plaintiffs and grooming and controlling plaintiffs by following Epstein's direction and instruction so that plaintiffs look younger, and like he wanted them to.

If not for defendants acting as a cog in the perks machine, Epstein would not have been able to run a sex trafficking operation and commit gender-motivated violence against hundreds of women and minor girls, including plaintiffs, venue jurisdiction, and timeliness.

This action is brought under the Gender-Motivated Violence Protection Act, Hereafter, GMVA.

Further jurisdiction is proper in the court pursuant to CPLR Section 301, 302 as defendant Frederick Fekai and plaintiff Christy Ferguson are domiciled in the state of Connecticut and Patrick Combs is domiciled in New York City, so there is not complete diversity of parties.

Venue is proper in this court pursuant to CPLR Section 503 because at all times herein mentioned, a substantial part of the acts and omissions alleged herein occurred in New York County in the City of New York, and defendant Patrick Combs is domiciled in New York County in the City of New York.

Defendant's conduct violated New York's GMVA that exists to protect and provide legal recourse to persons, including the plaintiffs herein, from acts of gender-motivated violence as perpetrated by Epstein and his associates.

Furthermore, any statute of limitation that would otherwise apply to plaintiff's claims herein is told in accord with the doctrine of equitable estoppel, as based on the deception, duress, fraud, and or threats of retaliation and misconduct that Epstein and his co-conspirators used to silence his victims, including plaintiffs.

Comes now Bryan C. Kohberger by and through his attorney, Anne C. Taylor, public defender, and hereby moves the court for an order to file exhibit C of defendant's fourth supplemental request for discovery under seal.

This motion is made pursuant to I.C.A.R. 32I2D & E and I.C. section 74-1241(1) and (b) and (c) because, one, the documents contain facts or statements that might threaten or endanger the safety of individuals, two, it is necessary to preserve the right to a fair trial, and three, disclosure would constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

The next document we have is the State's Response to Defendant's Amended Motion to Stay Proceedings.

Case number CR29-22-2805.

State of Idaho, plaintiff.

Please take notice that the undersigned, pursuant to Rule 16 of the Idaho Criminal Rules, the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, and Articles 1, 2, 13, and 17 of the Constitution of the State of Idaho, request discovery and inspection of all materials discoverable by defendant per I.C.R. 16B1-8 and the aforementioned constitutional provisions, including but not limited to the following information, evidence, and materials outlined in the attached Exhibit C, dated this sixteenth day of June 2023.

And this document was signed by Ann Taylor.

The next document we have is the State's Response to the Defendant's Fourth Supplemental Request for Discovery.