What do you make of those two different ways that the Supreme Court was looking at this case?

So, I mean, you have two competing interests, as you said.

The one is to exclude whatever and whomever from your property.

And the other is if you have a valid concealed carry permit, can you carry wherever you generally go? And really, without uh with the what this really does is it allows people who already have those licenses to carry into public places um and the distinction really here is public um without that rule in place essentially you'd have to you could strap on your concealed carry uh firearm again but you're licensed to carry and qualified with And you'd have to leave it in your car if you went to Walmart, if you didn't have an express ability to bring that into Walmart.

Or if you're going into a restaurant or if you're going into, you know, run a quick errand and grab your dry cleaning, you'd have to constantly be taking your firearm on and off, leave it in the car.

It doesn't really make much sense because, again, it makes that concealed carry permit not toothless, but it's severely limiting.

And you have to essentially be very conscious of what you do with that weapon.

What does this ruling mean for them? What are the broader implications here?

Did you mention before president of a dog club?

Yeah, Cooley Club.

President of the Cooley Club of Australia.

Still? Still, yes.

Still, yes.

Yeah, I don't know.

I've got to wait for people to take.

and then how did the videoing come part of

They knew of his claims, Danny.

I mean, if we believe the boyfriend, number one, um, we have a 17-year-old saying, "I told you so." Um, to me, it's always a little bit of a suspect kind of thing because if he just told the parents but not his own parents, I have questions about that.

Um, but also, I mean, you have a, a parent who's being confronted by a 17-year-old boyfriend.

You have no idea what the relationship was like.

Was it antagonistic? Was it friendly? Was it amicable? We don't know.

And all of a sudden this guy's saying, "Oh, your, your other son is a, is a dangerous guy." I mean, your first thought as a parent is, "Get out of here.

You don't know what you're talking about.

If I intend to subdue you, Dan Ruben, by asphyxiating you until you're subdued or holding you by the arms resulting in bruises that Joe Scott Morgan described, that is an aggravated assault, and if a death occurs intentionally or not during that felony, textbook case, felony murder, life.

If the machines aren't calibrated properly, you can challenge whatever finding in court

courtSo before they even stop her, they have to make sure the machine is calibrated.

At the stop, they have to advise the person, do, do you wanna give breath or blood? Do you wanna blow into the PAS test machine or do you want to give blood? Uh, if...

Generally, the person has to choose one or the other.

Sometimes they choose both.

But if they don't have the opportunity to choose, then again, the DUI can get thrown out.

If they choose to do the breath test, uh, they blow at the scene.

So if nobody else will help her, the prosecutor needs to do the right thing and get her clean.

What do you think?

I think if they had something from the body, they would have been bringing charges a lot sooner.

It seems like if they're looking into indicting for homicide, whichever one they pick, they probably got some information from a witness that they questioned.

over the past month or two.

I know they're going to be calling back witnesses in February.

That's what I read.

So it seems like they're still trying to find more evidence.

Sounds to me like they got the witness, the witness testified, and now we're looking at a homicide indictment.

What, risk all of that just for money? Hell no.

Why? I mean, it's, it's probably a number of things.

Again, assuming everything in the complaint is true.

Um, we're talking about an access to not just money, but a lot of money, $9 million, a lot of money.

And you're hobnobbing with people who are of very high social status and very high wealth individuals.

I mean, you don't just get that access from anyone.

Um, and being part of that world, uh, can change you.

How do you deal with that?

What risk all of that just for money? Hell no.

Why? I mean, it's it's probably a number of things.

Again, assuming everything in the complaint is true.

We're talking about an access to not just money, but a lot of money.

Nine million dollars is a lot of money.

And you're hobnobbing with people who are of very high social status and very high wealth individuals.

I mean, you don't just get that access from anyone.

How do you deal with that?