Cyber Security and Resilience Bill

According to the Financial Times and The Guardian, UK ministers are drafting compulsory safety reporting for frontier AI developers.

Reportedly, that includes incidents where agents act maliciously or beyond their intended scope, possibly through the Cybersecurity and Resilience Bill.

Compulsory.

Today it's voluntary, right?

That is exactly what McCullum's talking about.

We then look at the cybersecurity analysis from this year, published back in May, and they confirm that against this backdrop, again, similar rhetoric to do with the radical uncertainty that McCullum talks about, the Cybersecurity and Resilience Bill, which of course has not yet passed, aims to deliver a step change in the UK's national security.

So almost identical language, making, uh, digital services more secure in the face of cyber criminal and state actors.

And here we go.

Speaking at Imperial College London, Narayan announced expanded use of frontier AI to secure government systems that builds on two pilots that helped identify and fix more than one thousand vulnerabilities.

He also announced changes to the Cybersecurity and Resilience Bill.

The UK AI Security Institute has independently evaluated more than fifty-five AI systems before release.

On Monday, it also set out priorities for new technical best practice.

The harder public question is what happens when an autonomous system causes a serious incident and nobody can easily reconstruct its decisions.

The British government announced work on cyber responses for serious autonomous agent incidents, security evaluations for frontier models, and possible AI incident reporting measures under its Cybersecurity and Resilience Bill regime.

Two government pilots have reportedly identified and addressed more than 1,000 potential vulnerabilities.

Officials are also examining how serious AI incidents and near misses could be identified and reported.

So with smaller businesses, they don't care about how secure they are.

They care, well, if we get attacked, are we insured? And can we make a claim? Or alternatively, can we win more business? So in the UK, there's something called the Cybersecurity Resilience Bill, and we've seen lots of small businesses that now care about being compliant purely so they can either stay in big tenders or win tenders.

They aren't really interested in being secure effectively, and that's still the same kind of vibes we were getting 10, 20 years ago.

People say they're concerned, but it tends to be a lost leader for a certain reason.

Wahnsinn.

Und Großbritannien zieht ja mit seiner Cyber Security and Resilience Bill in eine ähnliche Richtung.

Aber die legen den Fokus extrem auf 'ne ganz spezifische Gruppe.

Die Managed Service Provider, die MSPs.