
CRINK
23
MENTIONS
11
EPISODES
11
PODCASTS
Search complete. 23 mentions across 11 episodes found for "CRINK".
Oct 2, 2026
US-China, Sheen on the Demonic, Global Jihad
R
16:50Raymond ArroyoHOST
I mean, Russia, China, North Korea, uh, linking, by the way, I- Iran in the background.
R
16:56Raymond ArroyoHOST
Is that the true alliance now, or axis, if you will? And is Beijing the senior partner?
G
17:03Gordon ChangGUEST
Oh, Beijing is clearly the senior partner, um, and we're seeing in the CRINKS, China, Russia, Ind- uh, Iran, North Korea, their, their very close bonds now.
G
17:13Gordon ChangGUEST
For instance, North Korea once had only one formal military alliance.
G
17:17Gordon ChangGUEST
That was with China.
Did Trump offer arms to Xi Jinping? What happened on the White House tour
P
7:58Peter HartcherGUEST
China, of course, uh, is arming, uh, and assisting Iran and Russia with dual use technologies, with intelligence, with dr- the whole thing.
P
8:09Peter HartcherGUEST
Xi Jinping is the man behind the arming, uh, and, and assistance to the so-called CRINKs, um, alliance, which is China, Russia, Iran, North Korea.
P
8:21Peter HartcherGUEST
Xi Jinping is the leader of that alliance, de facto alliance.
P
8:24Peter HartcherGUEST
It's not a formal one.
Trump & Xi - Managing the Mirage: Ann E. Kowalewski
M
40:22Michael AllenHOST
Um, we always talk about the cooperation between Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea.
M
40:32Michael AllenHOST
People call it everything from the axis of upheaval, um, all sorts of terms.
M
40:39Michael AllenHOST
W- w- are we making too much of this? Are they just sort of doing what we do all the time, which is sell arms to each other and occasionally sh- share intelligence? Is it something that we've already got China at the very top of our national security worry list.
M
40:58Michael AllenHOST
Is the axis of upheaval a real thing, and it, should it be something that we talk about more?
A
41:05Ann E. KowalewskiGUEST
This is a great question, Michael.
A
41:07Ann E. KowalewskiGUEST
I actually do think that it is a little unique because it's not just...
Trump & Xi - Managing the Mirage: Ann E. Kowalewski
M
40:24Michael AllenHOST
We always talk about the cooperation between Russia, China, Iran, Iran.
M
40:31Michael AllenHOST
And North Korea, people call it everything from the axis of upheaval, all sorts of terms.
M
40:40Michael AllenHOST
Are we making too much of this? Are they just sort of doing what we do all the time, which is tell arms to each other and occasionally share intelligence? Is it something that – we've already got China at the very top of our national security worry list, right? Is the axis of upheaval a real thing? And should it be something that we talk about more?
A
41:05Ann E. KowalewskiGUEST
This is a great question, Michael.
A
41:07Ann E. KowalewskiGUEST
I actually do think that it is a little unique because it's not just...
James M. Lindsay | Distinguished Senior Fellow | Council on Foreign Relations
N
17:48Nathan KikerHOST
Let's turn to America's adversaries.
N
17:51Nathan KikerHOST
We increasingly hear about an axis of autocracies involving China, Russia, Iran, North Korea.
N
17:58Nathan KikerHOST
You've written about this yourself.
N
18:00Nathan KikerHOST
How real is that coordination? Are they just states with their own agenda who sometimes talk to each other, or are they actively coordinating with a shared view of America and their own goals in the world?
J
18:13James M. LindsayGUEST
I think we have to be very careful here because the reality is sort of midway between the two sort of polls you laid out, Nathan.
J
18:24James M. LindsayGUEST
First...
J
18:25James M. LindsayGUEST
The axis of autocracies is not something akin to NATO with the secretariat and the Chinese ambassador shows up with the Russian ambassador and the Korean ambassador and the Iranian ambassador, and they plot how to coordinate their policies.
J
18:44James M. LindsayGUEST
But it's also not the case that it's just four countries that all harbor an animus toward the United States.
The AI Resilience Loop: ISMS Online on Bridging the Governance Gap
R
11:29Rory DuncanHOST
Yeah.
C
11:29Christina RichmondHOST
Part of the CRINKS gang.
R
11:31Rory DuncanHOST
Oh, the CRINKS.
C
11:31Christina RichmondHOST
And in our news...
C
11:32Christina RichmondHOST
Yes, the CRINKS.
C
11:34Christina RichmondHOST
We have that in our news newsletter today as well.
C
11:37Christina RichmondHOST
Uh, so what are the CRINKS, Rory?
R
11:39Rory DuncanHOST
Oh, so this is the combined forces of darkness, which are, in this regard from a cyber perspective, China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea.
STRAT | 27 SEP 2026 | CRINK on the Brink
H
0:28Hal KempferHOST
For China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, this is this alliance of these four countries, very interconnected, very mutually supporting in every way, and how events in various regions, events in Europe, events in the Middle East, are really changing things pretty rapidly and could have some strategic impact on this informal grouping of these four countries.
H
0:57Hal KempferHOST
Now, For those of you who have not heard that acronym before, my understanding is that the geopolitical term CRINK for C-R-I-N-K, for China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, was first coined back in around 2017 by a guy named Mark Anderson, who was a founder of the Strategic News Service.
H
1:21Hal KempferHOST
Later in 2023 at the Halifax International Security Forum, a guy named Peter Van Praagh pushed it out there.
H
1:29Hal KempferHOST
I think that's about the time I started hearing about it.
The truth about Xi & Trump’s summit – with Dr. Edward Howell
F
28:49Freddy GrayHOST
That was Edward Howell, who is a lecturer at Oxford University in International Relations, and he's a specialist on China and China's relationship with North Korea.
F
29:01Freddy GrayHOST
And he also has a new book out, which is called The New Axis of Upheaval.
F
29:06Freddy GrayHOST
Do have a look out for that.
F
29:08Freddy GrayHOST
It's a very, very important subject indeed.
Updating How We Think About Korean Peninsula Security
S
48:20Sanghun SeokGUEST
In the past, I had a slightly different view about the usefulness of the terminology trink, because traditionally, North Korea has been oscillating between Moscow and Beijing, and by naming them as a solid group, there is a danger that- It might consolidate them even more and make us blind about internal dynamics that might lead to divergence between those authoritarian states.
S
48:50Sanghun SeokGUEST
But as of now, uh, due to institutionalization of that relationship as evidenced by continued high-level exchanges and continued cooperation, not only in military domains, but also in economic sectors, CRINKS looks stronger than it used to be.
S
49:09Sanghun SeokGUEST
To the contrary, our challenge is that we are not as united or coordinated maybe compared to what CRINKS is.
S
49:18Sanghun SeokGUEST
Although we often discuss and talk about the convergence of the securities in the Indo-Pacific and the European theater, and it is true that North Korean troops are fighting alongside Russia in Ukraine, and South Korea has become an important defense partner in Europe.
S
49:38Sanghun SeokGUEST
But at the same time, I'm not really sure whether this greater interconnection really means, uh, real strategic convergence.
Russia vs. the West
H
19:29Hanna NotteGUEST
But, you know, so much for the BRICS alliance.
H
19:31Hanna NotteGUEST
I think you know that we've had a lot of talk in Washington, in Western capitals over the last few years of another alliance that Russia has allegedly forged, the Axis of Upheaval, or some call it the CRINC, so Russia's partnership with China, Iran and the DPRK.
H
19:48Hanna NotteGUEST
Unarguably, these countries have been very important supporters of Russia, supporting its economy and its defense enterprise.
H
19:56Hanna NotteGUEST
And there's these deepening connections between Russia and these three partners.
1 more episode mentions CRINK.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.