So

I'm going to use some slightly wonky words, but, you know, this is a special audience.

So like engagement based rankings.

So the thing that's like, well, you looked at it, you clicked it, you liked it, you posted it right that, you know, just keep juicing that and giving it to you again and again.

Autoplay, you know, targeted profiling, like the thing that got me to buy that stupid thing.

It's great.

And kind of infinite scrolls, stuff like that.

Is that the kind of broad strokes of what the Kids Act includes?

And sometimes we forget that like purely chronological isn't a great place to be.

Or it's also an algorithm, right? Chronological plus followers isn't like, there's no, like, let me acknowledge for your users.

I know that there's no such thing as a non-algorithmic thing.

Like, you know, somebody has to write a computer program that determines in what order the material will appear.

Yes, we all know that.

But the question is, and this is where I would, and I feel bad because I feel like I'm having an argument with a dude who's not in the room, right? But like, I think where I would quarrel with the way that Mike characterizes it is that he says, nothing in, this is what we think you should look at next, is by definition a full-throated endorsement of the content.

It's literally based on other stuff you've looked at and our own weights and priorities, a phrase that I would argue is doing a lot of work there.

The prod is working, right? Who's going to be the winners and losers in that kind of fallout between national and block-wide legislation? Is it going to make sense to have a kind of blanket approach? Is Macron going to be furious because he hasn't got his own approach? How do you see that shaping up?