Continual improvement process

Na klar.

Ja, und damit bist du mit dieser KVP-Logik, ja, Continual Improvement Verbesserungsprozess, bist du ein wandelnder Vorwurf.

Und das, ähm, führt zu Friktion im, in der Beziehung, ähm, oder Friktion im System.

Ähm, dann tatsächlich, ähm, überf, also wenn ich also auf meine Coachees gucke, die überfordern sich sehr, weil sie eben alle Dimensionen, die die Gesellschaft an sie herankarrt an möglichen Feldern für Leistung, s..., sie ziehen sich diesen Schuh an, sie nehmen sich dieser Dimension an und wollen ihr gerecht werden und sagen eben nicht: „Ganz ehrlich, das ist nicht mein Bereich, das mach ich einfach nicht." Also ich sehe Frauen, die natürlich supergut im Beruf sein wollen.

The burnout, doing too many things.

Actually, when the pressure hits and misalignment, in Six Sigma and Continuous Improvement, we have what we call the eight wastes.

So a lot of the waste is like the over, the over something.

So we start overproducing, over processing.

It's been really interesting.

So the organisation delivers Yellow Belt, which is not an apprenticeship, and then moved into delivering the Level 4 Improvement Practitioner, which is the Green Belt, which unfortunately has just been defunded.

So...

i saw that

If you're not, you're going to have a problem staying in business in today's landscape.

So, I mean, if your brewery is not, you know, it doesn't have a continuous improvement mindset, you're losing the game, right? So it's like, even if you're not up against it to Garrett's point, you know, can we shave cycle times? Can we, you know, lower our losses? Can we boost our brew house efficiency? Can we run higher operating efficiencies on our packaging equipment? If you're not, you should, you should be looking at that stuff.

Even if you have empty tanks and you're, you're not up against your capacity, that's, that's kind of, uh, in today's climate, you know, you should be thinking that in the worst of times and the best of times, frankly.

What are the most frequent spatial or structural surprises brewers encounter when fitting used equipment into an existing layout?

But I guess to the point you were making, Vaughan, there is so much behind the scenes that goes into model development.

And even in our current model range now around material selection testing and certification testing in both the fea which is finite element analysis perspective all of our suspension all of our chassis are engineer certified by a qualified and certified engineer by the government here in australia as well as real world testing a real life testing and in particular you three gentlemen probably do a lot of that heavy lifting still within the business and all of that stuff you feed back into our teams for continuous improvement but to the to the point where our suspension arms our chassis we are sourcing steel from places that other factories don't even know exist from reputable suppliers that have the correct certification we have the mill certificates for everything we do even to the point where our safety chains we are batch testing them in australia for every batch so we go the extra mile because we want to be able to stand by our product from the very very start so When we're doing the chassis design, full off-road is a no-brainer for us.

We have to be able to do full off-road for our off-road product.

We're certifying it to that.