Skip to main content
Constitution of Ohio

Constitution of Ohio

Search complete. 13 mentions across 11 episodes found for "Constitution of Ohio".

Oct 16, 2026

Mike McIntyreHOST
2:11
And Sarah, what did the appeals court say was unconstitutional about the program? What's its problem with it?
Sarah DonaldsonGUEST
2:18
Yeah, so in this circumstance, the judge, David Leland, wrote that it violates the Ohio Constitution by funding a separate school st- system instead of abiding by the Constitution, which the state government has to do, and fund a singular public education system, um, that it lacks state oversight, and that it's unavailable to many rural Ohioans who are footing the bill through it by their- by, you know, putting their tax dollars toward it.
Mike McIntyreHOST
2:45
Certainly, and we, we...
Mike McIntyreHOST
2:46
This has become a very partisan issue.
Chris QuinnHOST
1:07
Lisa, what happened this week to the billion-dollar-plus private school voucher program?
Lisa GarvinPANELIST
1:14
Yeah, well, Ohio's Tenth Appeals Court found that the EdChoice and the EdChoice expansion voucher programs violate the Ohio Constitution that mandates a thorough and efficient system of common schools for the state.
Lisa GarvinPANELIST
1:28
The ruling said that private schools are subject to less oversight and scrutiny.
Lisa GarvinPANELIST
1:32
They can cherry-pick their students.
Jack WindsorHOST
6:32
Judge David J. Leland wrote the opinion for the three-judge panel in Columbus.
Jack WindsorHOST
6:39
The program funds a second school system in violation of the Ohio Constitution's mandate for a single system of common schools, lacks state oversight, and diverts money from public districts.
Jack WindsorHOST
6:51
Now, that's according to that three-judge panel.
Jack WindsorHOST
6:54
The lawsuit came from a coalition called Vouchers Hurt Ohio, whose spokesman, Bill Phyllis, called EdChoice a $1 billion boondoggle for mostly religious schools.
Stephanie HaneyHOST
7:48
Hmm.
Stephanie HaneyHOST
7:49
Justice Hawkins, when Ohio Supreme Court candidates receive endorsements from groups, for example, like Right to Life, or Planned Parenthood, or maybe a utility company, are those groups seeking a certain outcome when those candidates are interpreting the Ohio Constitution?
Dan HawkinsGUEST
8:04
I can't speak for the groups.
Dan HawkinsGUEST
8:06
I know when I get endorsed by an organization, whether it's Fraternal Order of Police, um, Cleveland Building Trades, all these different organizations, um, they know not to expect a certain outcome or decision from me.

27 MINS LATER

Marilyn ZayasGUEST
34:55
Our decision should be based on whether the law has actually changed in, you know, in written form.
Marilyn ZayasGUEST
35:01
So sometimes the legislature has changed the language, and so that necessitates a different interpretation, right? So that's not, that's not really parting from stare decisis, okay? Um, so there's very limited circumstances, but we as judges should always make sure that we are deciding based on what's presented to us.
Stephanie HaneyHOST
35:25
When Ohio Supreme Court candidates receive the endorsements of different groups, for, for example, two on opposite ends of the spectrum, Right to Life or Planned Parenthood, we'll say, or a utility company maybe, are these groups seeking a certain outcome when those candidates are interpreting the Ohio Constitution?
Marilyn ZayasGUEST
35:41
I certainly hope not.
Steven ZieglerHOST
5:28
But a little behind the scenes with what happened with Vivek, he's just an incredibly prepared person.
Steven ZieglerHOST
5:36
Most people don't – nobody saw this and only people there would know this, but he showed up and he's sitting there with his team going over notes and going over everything that – you're like, okay, what does the Ohio Constitution say here on open field doctrine and why should we believe this and is this right? He's so overly prepared.
Steven ZieglerHOST
5:54
I actually think it's one of his biggest problems with his campaign is that – Some people are like, oh, well, he doesn't relate.
Steven ZieglerHOST
6:02
My assessment of that is that it's because he's so prepared, you don't get to watch him think.
Stephanie HaneyHOST
32:07
So when an Ohio Supreme Court candidate receives the endorsement of a particular group, I'll mention two hypothetical groups on both sides of the spectrum here, Right to Life or Planned Parenthood, for example, or even a utility company or something along those lines.
Stephanie HaneyHOST
32:21
Are those groups seeking a certain outcome when those candidates are interpreting the Ohio Constitution?
Colleen O'DonnellGUEST
32:31
As a former, excuse me, a current candidate and a former judge, I have received contributions from all manner of individuals who care about the court.
Colleen O'DonnellGUEST
32:40
I wouldn't presume to... guess at what they might be seeking to use your term when they contribute to any judge or judicial candidate, I think it's important to remember that the canons of judicial ethics expressly permit a candidate to seek, to accept, and to use endorsements.
Jack WindsorHOST
2:12
Remember, there's no longer a grace period.
Jack WindsorHOST
2:15
So on your ballot, governor, U.S. Senate, attorney general, auditor, secretary of state, treasurer, and statewide Issue 3, which puts Ohio's photo ID requirement into the Ohio Constitution.
Jack WindsorHOST
2:29
The General Assembly put Issue 3 on the ballot.
Jack WindsorHOST
2:33
Some numbers.
Noah SpinnerGUEST
38:54
Again, it gets this as close as we g- have ever gotten to the holding of Dirksen v.
Noah SpinnerGUEST
38:59
State of Ohio and our constitutional, uh, obligation as a state, and we have, again, lawmakers that have thrown the Ohio Constitution to the wind in that sense and, like, not fully funding our public schools.
Noah SpinnerGUEST
39:08
But it's making sure, again, our resources are going to where they need to be.
Noah SpinnerGUEST
39:11
I, I look at my district, and, and funding for public schools also not only was it personal to me back when I was a, a student at the age of 18, inspired my first run for, for public office.
RyanHOST
0:15
Now, Leah, could we start off maybe by giving us a rundown of what is imminent domain and who can use it?
Leah CurtisGUEST
0:21
So I think most people know, but eminent domain is a taking of private property for a public use that is allowed for under the Ohio Constitution when that land is taken and paid for after compensation determined by a jury.
Leah CurtisGUEST
0:34
So most governmental entities can take property.
Leah CurtisGUEST
0:37
There are sometimes specifics on what they can take property for.
Jack WindsorGUEST
14:19
The law Two separate rules.
Jack WindsorGUEST
14:22
Article 2, Section 3 of the Ohio Constitution says a representative must live in the district for one full year before the election.
Jack WindsorGUEST
14:29
Ohio Revised Code Section 3.15 says he must stay a resident for the whole term or forfeit the seat.
Jack WindsorGUEST
14:36
The house was bought October 2025.

1 more episode mentions Constitution of Ohio.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.