Concurrent jurisdiction

I haven't looked at this, but this is something you run into periodically.

If these two judges are at the same level laterally, their ports of what are called concurrent jurisdiction, the judge, you were there in front of watching me doing the argument with Milton.

If he makes a ruling.

The court, the other court, which has concurrent jurisdiction, meaning they're on the same level, they're not vertically one over the other.

It's not an appellate court.

Then you've got one of these issues where what does one judge do and how does that impact the other judge and bind or potentially bind the other judge? which is a fair question and a fair statement and certainly a fair game for the questioning, as I think you saw.