Skip to main content
Clause

Clause

Search complete. 12 mentions across 7 episodes found for "Clause".

Sep 15, 2026

Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
43:53
This reading of the Constitution is in conformity with all the rules of construction, but that it is right can be shown from the language of the instrument itself.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:03
In Article 1st, Section 9th, Clause 3rd, we find this provision.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:09
No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:14
In Article 1st, Section 10, Clause 1st, which section is composed entirely of restraints on the power of the states, we find this provision.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:23
No state shall pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, etc., etc.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:31
Had the provision of Clause 3rd, Section 9, been intended to limit the powers of the states, Clause 1st, Section 10, would clearly have been unnecessary.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:41
The latter provision, therefore, is one of the few instances in which the power of the states themselves is positively restrained by the Constitution of the United States.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:53
Although several states have conceded to the United States most of the higher attributes of sovereignty, they have reserved to themselves nearly all of the functions that render governments free or otherwise.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
41:21
This reading of the Constitution is in conformity with all the rules of construction, but that it is right can be shown from the language of the instrument itself.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
41:31
In Article 1st, Section 9th, Clause 3rd, we find this provision.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
41:37
No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
41:42
In Article 1st, Section 10, Clause 1st, which section is composed entirely of restraints on the power of the states, we find this provision.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
41:51
No state shall pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, etc., etc.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
41:59
Had the provision of Clause 3rd, Section 9 been intended to limit the powers of the states, Clause 1st, Section 10 would clearly have been unnecessary.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
42:09
The latter provision, therefore, is one of the few instances in which the power of the states themselves is positively restrained by the Constitution of the United States.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
42:21
Although several states have conceded to the United States most of the higher attributes of sovereignty, they have reserved to themselves nearly all of the functions that render governments free or otherwise.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
43:54
This reading of the Constitution is in conformity with all the rules of construction, but that it is right can be shown from the language of the instrument itself.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:03
In Article 1st, Section 9th, Clause 3rd, we find this provision.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:09
No bill of attainder or ex post facto law shall be passed.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:15
In Article 1st, Section 10, Clause 1st, which section is composed entirely of restraints on the power of the states, we find this provision.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:24
No state shall pass any bill of attainder, ex post facto law, etc., etc.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:31
Had the provision of Clause 3rd, Section 9 been intended to limit the powers of the states, Clause 1st, Section 10 would clearly have been unnecessary.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:42
The latter provision, therefore, is one of the few instances in which the power of the states themselves is positively restrained by the Constitution of the United States.
Robert H. CherneyNARRATOR
44:53
Although several states have conceded to the United States most of the higher attributes of sovereignty, they have reserved to themselves nearly all of the functions that render governments free or otherwise.
David BesleyHOST
47:49
So, yeah, it looks like he's staying Robert there.
David BesleyHOST
47:52
What today is it? Stoke triggered Victor's Clause that I don't think about for a million.
David BesleyHOST
47:56
OK, there we go.
David BesleyHOST
47:58
Right then, let's talk about transfer rumours before we move on to Tramby real quickly.
Steve RichardsHOST
33:57
So I'm amazed I don't know of these.
Steve RichardsHOST
34:00
The second in 1984 at the time of the Brighton bomb, and the third a few years later during the introduction of Clause, subsequently Section 28.
Steve RichardsHOST
34:10
All three are thrillers, hugely entertaining, while also being really effective in capturing the times in which they are set.
Steve RichardsHOST
34:18
Thank you, David, very much.

Daily Download

RBS - 8.31.26

Aug 31 · 1 Mention

Tony RizzoHOST
32:30
Kate Smith's done a phenomenal job.
Tony RizzoHOST
32:32
But that whole Andrew Miller thing, where you would have had him in the eighth and Klauze in the ninth, I can't – I'm sorry I think about it.
Tony RizzoHOST
32:40
As a guards fan, I do.
Aaron GoldhammerHOST
32:41
The
Rich DavisonHOST
24:47
Fuck.
Brian EdwardsHOST
24:48
"I had to ask Clause, C- Claude, because I've never spoken to her or seen her." Um, people did not find that response, mm, uh, appropriate, we'll say.
Leah HayduHOST
25:00
Yeah, I have a question.
Brian EdwardsHOST
25:01
And yeah.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.