Cardinal

What did...

the letter signed by the Pope, written by Cardinal Fernandez and a couple of other ne'er-do-wells, what did it say? It said the Holy Spirit does dwell inside other religions.

It says that people can find God in other religions and that we should esteem them.

The good, not just the good things they get right, like, you know, most religions say don't commit murder, right? Don't steal, basic stuff, but...

And it's like it's remember you guys heard it this week.

I talked about it earlier this week.

Cardinal Schoenborn, the emeritus from Vienna.

What did he say when he was asked? Well, Cardinal, what do you think about the vast majority of kids in schools in Austria are Muslim? He who has the children has the future.

Don't miss it next week.

Leo XIV's father has formally repealed the pay cuts that Pope Francis imposed on cardinals and senior courier officials back in 2021. cuts francis justified at the time by citing the vatican's mounting deficit and straining pension funds now those numbers have not improved father what does it tell us that the first major fiscal act of the pontificate is to restore money to the cardinals rather than fix financial problems

Well, I think it's a good idea to restore money to the Cardinals because it was sort of done not so much to save money because the amount saved compared to the entire budget was completely trivial.

It was more or less sending a message from the Pope that he didn't want Cardinals having the same amount of money because they wanted to show more poverty in their lifestyle.

Well, Cardinals have a lot of expenses, so we can leave it at that.

Now, he has done some other financial things which are a little bit under the radar, including ending the fundraising arm of the Holy See that Pope Francis had set up.

So I think he's conscious he's got to deal with finances.

Special offer.

we had stunning news hit the traditional catholic world yesterday we now have the number of priests who left the sspx took the invitation from Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez to come into full regular communion with the Synodal Church, as long as they allowed themselves to be essentially watched by what looks like a police state operation by the Vatican, probably for the rest of their lives.

That number is shocking in a sense.

Shockwaves throughout the Catholic community.

He's continuing the policy, which I know is shocking to some people who think that Leo is somehow better than Francis, but here we are.

He says, "...nevertheless, buried beneath the statistics is something considerably more revealing about the position in which traditional Catholics now find themselves.

Under Pope Francis' 2021 motu proprio Traditiones Custodis, diocesan bishops were instructed to provide locations for Catholics attached to the older Missal." but specifically, quote, But Cardinal Arthur Roach's December 2021 response to ad dubia went considerably further in explaining the thinking behind the restriction.

The exclusion of the parish church, the dicastery stated, was intended to establish that celebration, according to the previous missal, is not part of the ordinary life of the parish community.

Yet, beneath this apparent tranquillity, profound changes were already gathering momentum.

Cardinal Thomas Wolsey had become the dominant figure in English politics, overseeing an unprecedented expansion of bureaucratic government.

royal administration grew increasingly sophisticated, requiring larger numbers of educated officials capable of implementing the Cardinal's ambitious policies.

It was within this expanding administrative world that Richard Rich first began to establish himself.

His early appointments, though relatively modest, revealed the qualities that would define his later success.

It also created unprecedented opportunities for ambitious officials willing to assist the King in achieving objectives that many regarded as morally or legally questionable.

few men recognised these opportunities more quickly or exploited them more successfully than Richard Rich.

The political revolution that followed the fall of Cardinal Wolsey in 1529 fundamentally altered the nature of royal government in England.

We've been going through it.

some items in regards to Pope Benedict XVI when he was still Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger back in the mid-1980s.

This section of the text says, Indeed, in November 1984, undoubtedly still impressed by the reading of the secret, Cardinal Ratzinger, while striving, quite clumsily, to justify non-publication, nevertheless gave a glimpse of important truths concerning its content.

We have already said that, while explaining that, according to the judgment of the popes, it, the third secret, would add nothing to what a Christian must know from Revelation, he indicated four important themes of this Revelation, which also belong to the Fatima message.

But in this enumeration, every informed reader can easily discern what corresponds to the already known message.

This is the content of the second secret.

And finally, what undoubtedly expressed the essential and specific themes of the third secret, the dangers threatening the faith and life of the Christian and therefore the world, and also the importance of the last times.

Further on, the Cardinal pointed out still another positive element of the final secret, but the things contained in this third secret correspond to what is announced in Scripture.