California courts of appeal

But then it depends on whether the NCAA would.

the California Court of Appeals would grant that stay, similar to the Ohio Court of Appeals, the Tennessee Court of Appeals, and the Georgia Court of Appeals.

But based on the fact that they were able to get a temporary restraining order, and I imagine Ryan Doughton, the attorney in that case, is the same attorney in a lot of these cases, is really gonna be hitting that language, that bylaw language, really, really hard.

It would kind of surprise me if they didn't grant the Plurian Junction after granting the TRO, but then we'll have to see what the Court of Appeals does.

By the 1979 trial, quote, "More than 1,000 palimony suits were pending in California alone, and the principle spread to some 15 other states." And, uh, in 1979, the trial court awarded Michelle Marvin $104,000.

Uh, but then in 1981, the California Court of Appeals threw it out, finding no basis in law for the figure.

So basically, the woman who- Created the concept of palimony, ultimately received nothing.

Hmm.

I'm positive of that.

I just don't know when the Georgia Court of Appeals and the California Court of Appeals will hear that stay request and will either grant it or deny it.

It's up in the air.

The eligibility for these three players is probably going to change multiple times between now and the start of the season and maybe even into the season.

Today, I'd like to briefly discuss the Tongue Trust matter.

It's a recent case out of the California Court of Appeal arising from a Los Angeles County Superior Court decision.

This case concerns the application of California's anti-lapse statutes.

In this case, the settler's son, who was a named trust beneficiary but pre-deceased her, and left three children.

But this is about Sonoma County's prosecution of Wen Shung.

And I most recently interviewed him and his attorneys after the California Court of Appeals, which is the mid-level appeals court, reversed.

Some of the charges.

And he had been convicted of a felony charge and two misdemeanor trespass charges.

We haven't had an execution in California in 20 years.

Then it's going to be a less expensive case, but it's still going to be millions of dollars, in my opinion, to get it done if you're talking about trial and the first appeal to the Court of Appeal and petition to the California Supreme Court.

And I apologize.

Is this also because of the quality of attorney that he was hiring? Because some people would look at this and say, okay, why doesn't he just hire private counsel, you know, less well-known than Blair Burke and company? Why not somebody else? Or are you still looking at high costs no matter who you retain as private counsel?