BSD licenses

I'm trying to think what the hell is it called, where you got like TrueNAS, OpenMediaVault.

BSD.

Umbrel, that's what I was thinking of.

Unraid.

It's, uh, Apache 2.0 license, which is quite surprising really because Apache 2.0 is one of the most, um, open licenses.

Literally, you can do whatever you want and, and the people are protected about, from being sued later on for using code.

So, which, which is not covered by the licenses of BSD and, and some of the other progressive ones.

Um, but I mean, literally you can take this, this program and remake it in your own fashion if you want to.

The OPNsense forum’s own position from a thread a while back.

OPNsense is built on the PF packet filter, which is BSD only.

You can absolutely build a Linux firewall, but it wouldn’t be OPNsense.

OpenWrt and IPFire exist.

You’re not replacing OPNsense with a cheaper OPNsense.

You’re choosing a different lineage.

BSD and TF on one side, Linux and nftables on the other.

And when you put it that way, the question stops being, "Is there a shortcut?" and becomes, "Which family do I want to live in?"

So github.com. I'm just interested in the license for now.

So it's under the BSD, uh, 3 Plus.

If you [chuckles] remember, that's the one that has only three items in it, so it's a free and open source, uh, license.

If you wanna know more about BSD type license, I also did a overview of this.

Uh, you can search for BSD on no jungle.com or other platforms where I upload to on livestream.

If the video did save properly, 'cause sometimes it di- did not.

All right.

Right.

California's lawmakers unanimously passed an exemption from their age verification law for any software distributed under GPL, MIT, BSD, or Apache open source licenses.

Which is good.

Which is good and makes sense because otherwise how the fuck are you going to, it's just, it's a shit show.