Brady v. Maryland
Court caseWikipedia
13
MENTIONS
9
EPISODES
5
PODCASTS
Search complete. 13 mentions across 9 episodes found for "Brady v. Maryland".
Sep 15, 2026
Bobby CapucciHOST
Indeed, a defense expert informed counsel it would require three additional years to review all the discovery from the 67 electronic devices and digital data alone.
Bobby CapucciHOST
By providing discovery in this manner, the state is failing to comply with the obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, Giglio v.
Bobby CapucciHOST
United States, Kyles v. Whitley, State v. Lankford, and Grubb v.
Bobby CapucciHOST
State.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Indeed, a defense expert informed counsel it would require three additional years to review all the discovery from the sixty-seven electronic devices and digital data alone.
Bobby CapucciHOST
By providing discovery in this manner, the State is failing to comply with the obligations under Brady v. Maryland, three seventy-three U.S. eighty-three, Giglio v.
Bobby CapucciHOST
United States, Kyles v. Whitley, State v. Langford, and Grube v.
Bobby CapucciHOST
State.
BaileyHOST
The district court then imposed two consecutive life sentences.
BaileyHOST
Fernandez asked the district court to reconsider, alleging that the prosecution had violated Brady v. Maryland.
BaileyHOST
He pressed that argument several times, first in a motion to vacate the verdict, then in a motion for a new trial, and again in a motion for rehearing.
BaileyHOST
According to Fernandez, the government should have disclosed that another alleged co-conspirator, Luis Rivera, had denied driving the getaway car.
12 MINS LATER
BaileyHOST
His take on substance is similar.
BaileyHOST
He offers the example of a prisoner who claims that prosecutors withheld mitigating evidence and that his lawyer was constitutionally ineffective for failing to pursue that evidence.
BaileyHOST
Fernandez posits that these arguments would fail to satisfy the legal intricacies of the doctrines related to Brady v. Maryland and Strickland v. Washington.
BaileyHOST
Still, Fernandez asserts, these half-baked legal challenges could count as extraordinary and compelling reasons that justify a reduced sentence.
Bobby CapucciHOST
2.
Bobby CapucciHOST
The state is complied with Brady v. Maryland and its progeny.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Defendant's arguments rest on a misunderstanding of the state's Brady obligations.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Under Brady, the prosecution has a duty to disclose evidence that is both favorable to the defense and material to either guilt or punishment.
13 MINS LATER
Bobby CapucciHOST
The state has abided by the requirements of the ICR.
Bobby CapucciHOST
2.
Bobby CapucciHOST
The state has not violated Brady v. Maryland and its progeny.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Or Mr. Kohlberger's due process rights.
Bobby CapucciHOST
2.
Bobby CapucciHOST
The state is complied with Brady v. Maryland and its progeny.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Defendant's arguments rest on a misunderstanding of the state's Brady obligations.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Under Brady, the prosecution has a duty to disclose evidence that is both favorable to the defense and material to either guilt or punishment.
15 MINS LATER
Bobby CapucciHOST
The state has abided by the requirements of the ICR.
Bobby CapucciHOST
2.
Bobby CapucciHOST
The state has not violated Brady v. Maryland and its progeny.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Or Mr. Kohlberger's due process rights.
speaker_0NARRATOR
What is not contested is that the jury that convicted Eileen Wuornos of murdering Richard Mallory did not know that the man she claimed had violently raped her before she shot him had a documented prior history of violent rape.
speaker_0NARRATOR
The legal standard at issue here is established by the Brady v. Maryland ruling from the United States Supreme Court, which holds that prosecutors must disclose material exculpatory evidence to the defense.
speaker_0NARRATOR
Evidence of the victim's prior violent sexual history, in a case where the defense is that the victim committed violent sexual assault immediately before being shot, is not a stretch of the Brady principle.
speaker_0NARRATOR
It is close to its core application.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Bad faith is the high bar requiring more than mere negligence.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Rather, bad faith refers to a calculated effort to circumvent the disclosure requirements established by Brady v. Maryland and its progeny.
Bobby CapucciHOST
State v. Sarbacher, 168 Idaho 306, 2020.
Bobby CapucciHOST
There was no calculated effort to circumvent Brady.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Bad faith is a high bar requiring more than mere negligence.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Rather, bad faith refers to a calculated effort to circumvent the disclosure requirements established by Brady v. Maryland and its progeny.
Bobby CapucciHOST
State v. Sarbacher, 168 Idaho 306, 2020.
Bobby CapucciHOST
There was no calculated effort to circumvent Brady.
Rinaldo McKenzieHOST
ordinary impeachment evidence together with evidence demonstrating motive or bias, and that this treatment conflicts with treatment court precedents governing disclosure of evidence favorable to a criminal defendant.
Rinaldo McKenzieHOST
And of course, he maintains that the issue implicates the government's constitutional disclosure obligations under the Brady v. Maryland and related cases.
Rinaldo McKenzieHOST
So whether Castro can establish a constitutional violation and whether indiscretion evidence was suppressed and sufficiently material to require relief remains, of course, for the courts to determine.
Rinaldo McKenzieHOST
But why were Castro's Trump lawsuit part of the case? That was my question and I did ask him.