Skip to main content
Attorney–client privilege

Attorney–client privilege

Search complete. 62 mentions across 3 episodes found for "Attorney–client privilege".

Sep 25, 2026

Bobby CapucciHOST
1:06
They would examine whether he ever questioned unusual transfers, refused transactions, or asked for supporting documentation.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:14
They would also determine which communications were legitimately protected by attorney-client privilege and which involved ordinary business activity rather than legal advice.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:24
Because Indyke operated at the intersection of Epstein's legal and financial structure, separating those functions would be one of the most complicated parts of the investigation.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:35
And of course, privilege would consequently become a battlefield almost immediately.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:41
An attorney's communications with a client are not automatically available to investigators merely because the attorney handled financial affairs.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:49
But attorney-client privilege generally protects confidential legal communications.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:54
Not every business transaction performed by someone who happens to be a lawyer.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:59
Investigators would therefore classify indict's activity transaction by transaction.
Bobby CapucciHOST
0:48
Introduction.
Bobby CapucciHOST
0:49
The defendant argues Ms. Roberts and two of her attorneys, Cassell and Edwards, have somehow placed at issue her confidential attorney-client communications and therefore have made a sweeping waiver of attorney-client privilege in this case.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:03
Defendant, however, fails to cite the controlling law on this issue.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:07
Federal Rule of Evidence 502.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:10
Enacted in 2008, Rule 502 was designed to block exactly the kind of argument the defendant is making.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:17
Rule 502 provides the litigants are entitled to the most protective laws on attorney-client privilege, either state law where the disclosure was made or federal law.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:28
The alleged disclosures in this case were made in Florida and under Florida law did not constitute any waiver of attorney-client privilege.
Bobby CapucciHOST
1:36
Indeed, defendant does not reveal to the court that the Florida judge who handled the case during which the alleged waivers occurred, the Dershowitz case, has already considered and rejected their entirety, the very argument that defendant is advancing here.
Lars LarsonHOST
48:54
I'll tell you what, Richard, you send me the information, I will promise to follow up on it and see what I can find out.
Lars LarsonHOST
49:00
Because I don't know how, if they had a report, what was the agency that did the report on the Gap Fire that's called Attorney-Client Privilege?
RichardAUDIENCE
49:10
It would be the investigating arm in Vallejo, California.
RichardAUDIENCE
49:15
And our district attorney in Siskiyou County contacted them.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.