Anti-Iranian sentiment

Now, a statement from the Iranian embassy was also released.

The circulation of such fabricated speculations, particularly in the aftermath of the criminal acts of aggression committed by the United States and the Israeli regime against Iranian people, will serve no purpose until other than to fuel Iranophobia propaganda in the UK.

The Islamic Republic of Iran reserves the right to take appropriate legal measures as necessary to safeguard the rights and interests of the country and its people in response to misleading and damaging media narratives.

Well, we don't know that it's misleading or damaging at this point because the five guys who showed up with bombs and chemicals have not yet been identified.

Linking Tehran to the arrest of five suspects near RAF Fairford is unfounded and malicious speculation.

Spreading fabricated claims like these is irresponsible and risks fueling Iranophobia, particularly in the wake of U.S. and Israeli actions against Iran.

Iran would be well within its rights to pursue legal measures to protect its interests.

The Fact and Spin podcast is brought to you by Warner Brothers' new film, Digger, only in theaters October 2nd.

Well, I guess what they're trying to tell you is whatever they say, don't believe a word of it because they never mean what they say.

They're calling attacks on them as having been part of a, quote, "plar- terror attack," which it said, according to the reports in the United Kingdom, that this is just going to fuel Iranophobia propaganda in Britain.

And the Brits are quoted as saying, "Be assured we're considering this from every possible angle, including that this may be actively committed by proxy." So they, did they commit it or not? But who cares whether they're proxies? This is why I'm saying that.

If proxies commit a crime, should they not pay a price for committing the crime or take a penalty for what they did? I'm sorry, but this is a, just a...

Well, I guess what they're trying to tell you is whatever they say, don't believe a word of it because they never mean what they say.

They're calling attacks on them as having been part of a, quote, "plar- terror attack" which it said, according to the reports in the United Kingdom, that this is just going to fuel Iranophobia propaganda in Britain.

And the Brits are quoted as saying, "Be assured we're considering this from every possible angle, including that this may be actively committed by proxy." So they, did they commit it or not? But who cares whether they're proxies? This is why I'm saying that.

If proxies commit a crime, should they not pay a price for committing the crime or take a penalty for what they did? I'm sorry, but this is a, just a, over and over we're hearing the same thing.

It notes the five men released on bail are all UK nationals from London.

The Iranian embassy in London says it categorically rejects and strongly condemns unfounded and malicious... linking Iran with the incident, adding that this would serve no purpose other than to fuel Iranophobia propaganda in the UK.

Metro, just as Metro's got something very odd is going on, and those are your UK headlines.

So the front pages themselves.

Prime Minister Andy Burnham has been chairing a Cobra meeting after five bomb plot suspects were released on bail despite targeting an RAF base.

This comes as the Iranian embassy labelled any suspicion they were involved as Iranophobia.

Is the Ayatollah more sensitive than he lets on? Plus...

But it's not progressive to allow a bigger and bigger benefits bill and a system which offers an income but doesn't offer a future.

You've heard of Islamophobia.

You've heard of homophobia.

Well, the embassy accuses us of Iranophobia.

Yes, the Iranians say that speculation of their involvement is an example of Iranophobia.