And next, uh, Andrew will talk about, uh, AFPD components and how customers can leverage AFPD's ecosystem.

All right.

Uh, so thank you, Ayberk, for that great explanation of the journey of AFPD, where we started and where we got to.

I will now give, um, an explanation of what AFPD looks like from a bird's eye view.

So let me go ahead and show a diagram of our system.

Uh, so this is what AFPD looks like, uh, from a bird's eye view.

It breaks down into three key sets of services.

So, yep, I think that those are basically the three ways our customers can consume these FYIs and annotations.

Is it the same with the approach to health promotion within primary care? I know that the primary care setup is broadly very similar to the UK as well.

Yeah, I think we have a little bit more...

The model here, again, for people who don't know, is that there is a capitation model.

So GP practices are part funded by the government, but most of them, many of them, are also... work on a part private model so patients pay a fee every time they see a GP which does change the dynamic in some ways for the better in some ways for the worse but it's a slight different model but by and large it's a very similar model and NHS GPs would slot in relatively easily with a few you know caveats into the New Zealand model But there is less target-based approach from a government level.

So we're not mandated to do as much kind of data collection and we're less target-driven than in the UK.

Yeah.

Which again, depending on which side of the coin you're looking at can be a good thing or a bad thing.

maybe

Who is Andrew Boyd?

Yeah.

Well, by trade, I'm a software engineer.

Yeah, you are.

That's right.

Doing it, you know, embedded systems here and there and just, you know, been a local Central Valley kid.

Just, you know, kind of like Ferdy.

they don't burn you when you sit out well anything you'd like to say any shout out any any advice you can give with a new shooter coming into the sport or maybe on the fence about it

And are there any indications that this cohort don't believe in climate change, that they've gone to any, they've put any effort into trying to disprove climate change? Or is it, no, I just don't want to give up my car and that's it?

I think the climate denial argument is very handy to sort of defend something that they feel is very traditionally masculine.

They're kind of holding on to things as the world changes around them.

So I think climate denial is a very sort of convenient argument.

But denial is part of a larger thing of climate denial, climate delay, and it's just a general sort of thoughtlessness and don't tell me how to live my life kind of thing.

Men recycle less, litter more, have a bigger carbon footprint.

But it also shows up in these very, you know, at least in the U.S., in some very sort of over-the-top, strange, aggro kind of ways.

Why do you think there isn't a different story being