come

in, when conversations happen with the male CEO about what those past decisions are or were, The board gives more recognition and belief in the decisions and doesn't question them as much as they do when there's a female CEO.

So for that female CEO that's coming in, the board has made a decision.

Maybe they made a decision a year ago.

When the female CEO is coming in or there's new board members that are coming in, all of a sudden people are like, well, wait a minute.

Why did you allow that decision to happen, female CEO? And even if you're brand new and coming in, still it's how come – You know, you, female CEO, new female CEO, why are you continuing with this decision? I don't think it was necessarily the right decision.

And I believe that you, female CEO, had something to do with that.

And you can see the personal fallout from this.