Akhil Reed Amar
American legal scholarWikipedia
58
MENTIONS
15
EPISODES
12
PODCASTS
Search complete. 58 mentions across 15 episodes found for "Akhil Reed Amar".
Sep 10, 2026
Ep. 1323: A Repubic If You Can Keep It
B
25:39Brian McClanahanHOST
He's purposely misrepresenting some things.
B
25:45Brian McClanahanHOST
Scholars such as Yale's Akhil Amar concede that the people of the several states ratified the Constitution.
B
25:51Brian McClanahanHOST
Amar contends, though, contends, however, that the act of ratification was the world's largest corporate merger, which created a single indissoluble united people.
B
26:00Brian McClanahanHOST
Amar is a distinguished scholar, but his merger theory would have been declared heretical by citizens living at the time of ratification.
More Statesmanship, and State Constitutions - Special Guests Steven B. Smith and Vikram D. Amar
A
0:05Andy LipkaHOST
[upbeat piano music] Welcome to another episode of Amar's Constitution.
A
0:20Andy LipkaHOST
I'm Andy Lipka, here with Professor Akhil Amar, now a year older.
A
0:25Andy LipkaHOST
And once again, we have guests today.
A
0:28Andy LipkaHOST
We have Professor Vik Amar returning to discuss yet another issue, and we'll have the second part of our interview with Professor Steven Smith on his new book on statesmanship and how that relates to constitutional matters, and so forth.
8 MINS LATER
S
8:42Steven SmithGUEST
But I do think the statesman, one of the points I wanna make in the book is that the statesman is a rare phenomenon.
S
8:49Steven SmithGUEST
We would be fortunate if we have one in our lifetime.
A
8:53Andy LipkaHOST
So just to follow up on this though, I don't wanna leave it yet because I think that Akhil's point about, or at least his question, that is there a moral component? And you're saying there's a normative component, but they're not quite the same thing.
A
9:07Andy LipkaHOST
And in terms of what you were saying with the Aristotelian trilogy or triad, as I'm listening to you, I'm thinking, okay, pathos.
Ep. 281: What's the First Amendment's original meaning? w/ Jud Campbell and Stephen Solomon
S
22:30Steven SolomonGUEST
I think also you go to the period of, uh, the debates over the, uh, the Constitution, the ratification period, um, just the freest possible debate.
S
22:44Steven SolomonGUEST
Um, Akhil Amar has written a lot about this, uh, in, in, in several essays.
S
22:49Steven SolomonGUEST
Um, there was no expectation or fear of, uh, seditious libel prosecutions or, or any other kind of punishment.
S
22:58Steven SolomonGUEST
They were putting up, uh, liberty poles.
Trump’s Canada Tariffs are Legally Vulnerable
E
5:39Elie HonigHOST
So two interesting events that I'm taking part in next week if you happen to be around.
E
5:43Elie HonigHOST
September 15th, if you are in the New Jersey area, that's Tuesday night, I'm gonna be doing a one-on-one interview for Constitution Day with Professor Akhil Reed Amar, the famous Yale Law professor who is a constitutional historian, a brilliant guy, a really interesting guy.
E
6:02Elie HonigHOST
That'll be on the campus of Rutgers University in New Brunswick, my alma mater, where I now teach.
E
6:06Elie HonigHOST
So if you're in the central, north, even south Jersey area and wanna see Professor Amar, wanna see me one-on-one with him, sign up for that.
Rotarian Edgar Lin, Deputy Director of Impact Programs, Protect Democracy
E
19:09Edgar LinGUEST
I don't use it because that sounds like a shoe I'm not cool enough to wear.
E
19:15Edgar LinGUEST
So the concept of it comes from Akhil Amar, who is one of the nation's leading constitutional scholar at Yale.
E
19:22Edgar LinGUEST
He often says that he is great friends with Justice Thomas.
E
19:26Edgar LinGUEST
It's been discussed very favorably by Judge Walker on the DC Circuit, one of the strongest Federalist Society credentials on the federal bench, and by Seth Waxman, former Solicitor General.
The Statesman's Constitution - Special Guest Steven B. Smith
A
0:09Andy LipkaHOST
Welcome to another episode of Amarica's Constitution.
A
0:13Andy LipkaHOST
I'm Andy Lipka here with Professor Akhil Amar.
A
0:16Andy LipkaHOST
Hello, Akhil.
A
0:17Andy LipkaHOST
Hey, Andy.
Myth of Birthright Citizenship with Prof. Richard Epstein
R
10:10Richard EpsteinGUEST
And why is that so important? Because it suggests there was no systematic gap between the two of them, that they were closely entwined.
R
10:18Richard EpsteinGUEST
And so to give you an illustration of the mistake, my good friend, John, in a recent piece on Civitas Outlook, in which he starts talking about the context of the Constitution has to prevail over the natural law sentiment.
R
10:31Richard EpsteinGUEST
The difficulty with that is a natural sentiment is what was embedded in the text.
R
10:36Richard EpsteinGUEST
And everybody knew it, including Vattel.
R
12:11Richard EpsteinGUEST
It's also in Kent when he quotes Vattel and so forth.
R
12:14Richard EpsteinGUEST
But we are told a completely different thing, and then we have to figure out what we're supposed to do, and we don't know what the answer to that question.
R
12:21Richard EpsteinGUEST
To make it worse, when you start saying it's a birthright citizenship stuff, the Supreme Court only applied this to essentially illegal aliens and transients, right? But my friend Akhil Amar, who always has a highly fevered intelligence, right? What he says is, look, I was born in the United States.
R
12:40Richard EpsteinGUEST
My older brother Vic was born overseas.
An Amendment Like Some Others - Special Guest Vikram D. Amar
A
0:00Andy LipkaHOST
[upbeat piano music] Welcome to another episode of "America's Constitution." I'm Andy Lipka, here with Professor Akhil Amar and a guest that our audience is very familiar with, Professor Vic Amar.
A
0:23Andy LipkaHOST
First of all, welcome back to your podcast, Akhil.
A
0:26Akhil Reed AmarHOST
To ours.
Why Does America Have the Electoral College? Peter Sagal Explains
P
6:20Peter SagalGUEST
And the reasons make a little sense if you consider it from their perspective.
P
6:26Peter SagalGUEST
The first thing you need to do is you need to remember, this is something that was impressed upon me by Akhil Reed Amar, a professor at Yale, a world-renowned expert in the U.S. Constitution who was our sort of in-house expert on our TV show Constitution USA for PBS.
P
6:40Peter SagalGUEST
Yes.
P
6:41Peter SagalGUEST
It's impossible for us now to comprehend how big America was, even just the 13 coastal colonies.
Should Federal Judges Get to Pick Federal Prosecutors?
J
9:18Jacob HuebertGUEST
It doesn't make too much sense that Congress could let courts appoint other people in the executive branch who have nothing to do with the courts.
J
9:26Jacob HuebertGUEST
And so we cite a law review article by Akhil Amar where he takes this issue on directly
M
9:33Mark ChenowethHOST
I was going to say, John, we don't always quote constitutional law professors here at NCLA, but when we do, we like to quote Akhil Amar.
M
9:39Mark ChenowethHOST
No, it's not usually Akhil Amar, but go ahead, Jacob.
M
9:43Mark ChenowethHOST
What does Professor Amar say?
J
9:45Jacob HuebertGUEST
Yeah, and so he takes that view that if you read this in the context of the whole Constitution and how it treats – Inferiors relative to superiors.
J
12:39John VecchioneHOST
They did it in the Defense of Marriage Act.
J
12:41John VecchioneHOST
They did it for other acts where they have said, you're going to argue for the government because the government's dropped out.
5 more episodes mention Akhil Reed Amar.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.