After-birth abortion

Belgium nurses have witnessed some form of euthanasia or infanticide.

But here, the Journal of Medical Ethics talks about after birth abortion, why should the baby live? Fetuses and newborns do not have the same moral status as actual persons.

This is, again, the article.

The authors argue that what we call after birth abortion, killing a newborn, should be permissible in all the cases where abortion is.

including cases where the newborn is not disabled.

The Journal of Medical Ethics has an article called After Birth Abortion, Why the Baby Should Live.

Why should the baby live? New York Times has an article, Why They Kill Their Newborns, a three-page article advocating decriminalized infanticide, and it's written by MIT's Steven Pinker.

Another article, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Abortion and Infanticide.

Yeah.

But when we talk about the abortion industry and the lobby that is, has pushed boundaries when it comes to what is the norm, I remember a article in the Journal of Medical Ethics that made a lot of waves in 2012, so 14 years ago, that was called After Birth Abortion: Why Should the Baby Live? And it got passed around a lot.

Obviously, it's very heady, philosophical.

Basically, these two, uh, doctors were arguing, bioethicists, that it, because a child can't realize their own needs and wants after birth, that after-birth abortion should also be permitted.