Adoption and Safe Families Act

... that we're talking about right now.

Um, and it was Hillary Clinton, the Adoption and Safe Families Act, that really brought all of this into, uh, into what it is, into this essentially a cottage industry, uh, in our country, uh, s- taking children, stealing children, putting them in foster homes, um, and, and that's where they do what they will with these children.

Um, and so it's, it's a very, a, a very difficult thing to fight.

Uh, American Made i- is doing our best, uh, s- with, we, we partner a lot with the Pacific Justice Institute to fight this in court, and what you find is even with these amazing lawsuits, these incredibly brilliant lawyers, um, you try to go up against the system, and you have judges that simply won't allow these cases in.

They protect these corrupt systems.

And, um, so it's very difficult, and that's what we're working towards, um, because all the laws are there They're, they're there.

In fact, in, um, 2019, um, you know, President Trump's Family First Act, that, that should have trumped, pardon the pun, should have trumped, you know, the Adoption and Safe Families Act.

They're still operating with the Adoption and Safe Families Act, just completely ignoring, uh, Trump's, you know, Family First Act, saying you don't take kids from a home un- unless it's a last resort.

Michael, in the context of the family policing system, rights get terminated.

as a result of a federal law called the Adoption and Safe Families Act, which dates back to 1997.

And I know has been discussed before on this show, right? So among the many things that AASFA does is it creates a timeline for children that are placed in the foster system.

When a child is separated from their family

Yeah, I mean, the story that the law tells is that this is, you know, that reunification is the goal for the vast majority of children that enter the foster system.

That is truly a myth.

One of the things that the Adoption and Safe Families Act did is create a mandate for what's called, again, in the law's terminology, concurrent planning.

So that means for