Skip to main content
Administrative law judge

Administrative law judge

Search complete. 64 mentions across 23 episodes found for "Administrative law judge".

Sep 10, 2026

Shadd DalesHOST
1:11
So big news, and it thickens the plot even more.
Shadd DalesHOST
1:14
And hopefully we get some news here relatively soon on the rescheduling front from Derek Julius, the ALJ.
Shadd DalesHOST
1:22
So with that, let's bring him in.
Shadd DalesHOST
1:24
AV, that's a big story that we got here this afternoon.

24 MINS LATER

Kyle ShermanGUEST
25:11
But like, yeah, I don't know.
Kyle ShermanGUEST
25:12
This is going to be a really interesting rest of the year, right? Is there a timeline that you guys know about like for when Schedule 3 for recreational or adult use actually might actually go into effect?
Anthony VarrellHOST
25:26
As soon as the ALJ comes out and gives us a recommendation, then the shot clock starts.
Anthony VarrellHOST
25:30
The problem is right now we're at the step in the process to where there is no time constraint.
Ed WeirHOST
2:28
And then guess what? If you disagree with that person, then you can go on to another appeal level.
Ed WeirHOST
2:33
For the Social Security Administration, that's called the ALJ, the Administrative Law Judge.
Ed WeirHOST
2:37
Unfortunately, it takes about a year to see one of those nowadays.
Ed WeirHOST
2:40
If you don't get satisfaction there, you can go to what's called the Appeals Council, Falls Church, Virginia.

34 MINS LATER

Ed WeirHOST
36:40
So you did the initial claim.
Ed WeirHOST
36:42
You filed the reconsideration.
Ed WeirHOST
36:44
You had your case with the administrative law judge.
Ed WeirHOST
36:47
You lost all three times.
Shadd DalesHOST
5:34
But really, this is a great update because we were talking about this earlier this week about clemency.
Shadd DalesHOST
5:39
And where is this topic? And it seems like it's gone to the backseat since all this rescheduling stuff has been talked about with the ALJ and the hearing that took place.
Shadd DalesHOST
5:46
But a great update and some common sense.
Shadd DalesHOST
5:48
And again, if you didn't see that interview from earlier this year that we have with Jerry, make sure to click on that link again in the pinned comment within this video.
Colin HarperHOST
47:15
Do you think that these will be stonewalled? Do you think that they'll go through? What's your read on whether or not the PUC will approve these lines for?
Tom KlecknerGUEST
47:25
I think they'll go through because the PUC can either remand back to the ALJ or approve or deny but remember they approved the permian basin reliability plan which is what these three lines are uh these are the import paths in bringing energy into the permian basin you know you've got three of them it's five segments together the one that's been approved had two segments uh that's the northern one then there's the there's the uh the middle path and then the bottom path.
Tom KlecknerGUEST
47:59
And those are three segments combined between them.
Tom KlecknerGUEST
48:04
I forget which one is which, but one has been, as you say, the ALJ is denied.
Tom KlecknerGUEST
48:11
And the second has been kind of tabled for now.
Tom KlecknerGUEST
48:14
It's one involving CPS Energy and I believe it's Lower Colorado River Authority.
Ran ChenHOST
0:10
Knowing this sequence is critical for exam day.
Ran ChenHOST
0:13
The process formally begins when the OPR files a complaint against a practitioner with an administrative law judge known as an ALJ.
Ran ChenHOST
0:21
The practitioner must then file an answer within the time specified in the complaint, which is typically 30 days.
Ran ChenHOST
0:29
Failing to answer can lead to a default decision, where the allegations are automatically deemed true.
Ran ChenHOST
0:35
An exam question will likely test this procedural step, for instance, by asking the consequence of failing to file a timely answer.
Ran ChenHOST
0:43
Once the answer is filed, the case proceeds to a hearing before the ALJ.
Ran ChenHOST
0:47
A key exam topic here is the burden of proof.
Ran ChenHOST
0:50
The OPR has the burden to prove its allegations by a preponderance of the evidence.
Shay GilmoreGUEST
9:23
So the administrative law judge recommends and the DEA decides.
Shay GilmoreGUEST
9:29
That's k- the s- the structure of, of this.
Shay GilmoreGUEST
9:34
And it's really kind of important to manage your client's expectations here, uh, because, uh, the ALG, the ALJ, rather, runs the hearing but doesn't actually decide the case.
Shay GilmoreGUEST
9:48
Uh, the judge issues a recommendation at the end, and the DEA administrator then reviews de novo and makes the call.
Shay GilmoreGUEST
9:58
So think about that for a second, [chuckles] right? The DEA is both the party proposing the rule and the judge of it at the same time.

11 MINS LATER

Shay GilmoreGUEST
21:07
Uh, so, you know, it's, you know, the situation that we're in right now is a hybrid system, and this was about unifying it all under, um, Schedule III or leaving it in this now status quo of a, a two-part system.
Shay GilmoreGUEST
21:24
Um, three, that DC Circuit challenge that I mentioned, it's still pending.
Shay GilmoreGUEST
21:29
And, uh, the DOJ conceded, uh, that there's ALJ removal problem, ALJ removal problems, uh, in related litigation.
BrascoHOST
2:20
Under the Code of Federal Regulations, the designated parties will have 20 days to file exceptions to the recommended decision, findings of fact, and conclusions of law.
BrascoHOST
2:28
But either which way, we get to this point, the ALJ will now make a non-binding recommendation to the DEA whether to keep cannabis listed in Schedule 1 or move it to Schedule 2 or 3.
BrascoHOST
2:40
Then once that recommendation is done, it'll be delivered to Cole, whose rescheduling action would likely become subject to judicial review should a losing party file on appeal.
BrascoHOST
2:50
That's the latest we have on the DEA and cannabis reclassification.
Ed WeirHOST
23:38
I've still got people on the inside.
Ed WeirHOST
23:40
And the longest, the ALJ, I think there was one at like 500 days or something like that.
Ed WeirHOST
23:47
I guess that was yours.
Ed WeirHOST
23:49
That's completely unacceptable.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
4:52
So you've gone through two review processes at that point.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
4:56
Unlike California, which I'm realizing now, is there are limits around how long a ALJ or the board has to issue their determination or decision.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
5:06
It's usually six months after briefings closed, or they can give themselves a three to six months extension.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
5:12
So that probably helps with the process a little bit because there actually is a deadline that they have to follow.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
8:46
In New York, there's really no discovery at the Division of Tax Appeals.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
8:50
Generally, the first time you get documents is 10 to 30 days before the hearing.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
8:55
That timeline is set by the ALJ.
Chelsea MarmoreHOST
8:58
There's no depositions unless you request them from the DTA.
Ed WeirHOST
21:44
Another person at that agency looks at your case, a completely different person, and then they make a decision.
Ed WeirHOST
21:51
And then if you're denied there, then you can go to the administrative law judge, ALJ.
Ed WeirHOST
21:58
And unfortunately, that takes about a year to get an appointment, to get a day in court with that person.
Ed WeirHOST
22:04
And if you're denied there, then you can go to the Appeals Council in Falls Church, Virginia.

13 more episodes mention Administrative law judge.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.