Skip to main content

Search complete. 5 mentions across 3 episodes found for "PubPeer".

Sep 11, 2026

Elisabeth BikGUEST
17:30
Some of them are a bit hidden, but I try to alert them.
Elisabeth BikGUEST
17:33
Then they can respond on Papir.
Elisabeth BikGUEST
17:36
Then at the same time, I will also send an email to the publisher or the journal editor where the paper had been published.
Elisabeth BikGUEST
17:46
so that the publisher then can initiate an investigation.
Bob McDonaldHOST
27:05
Well, over the summer a study came out that's shaking the very foundations of integrity in science.
Bob McDonaldHOST
27:12
Scientists analyzing many thousands of retracted and suspicious studies documented on sites like Retraction Watch and PubPeer have uncovered a widespread network of scientific fraud that threatens the very trust we have in science.
Bob McDonaldHOST
27:29
Dr. Reese Richardson led the work.
Bob McDonaldHOST
27:32
For him, this all started when he and a colleague began looking into why scientists decide to study certain genes.

7 MINS LATER

Reese RichardsonGUEST
34:31
So we had a few different case studies in how these things operate.
Reese RichardsonGUEST
34:36
One of those case studies had to do with looking at papers that share the same images in them when they shouldn't be sharing the same images.
Reese RichardsonGUEST
34:46
And a lot of these observations have been recorded on a site called PubPeer, where scientists can comment on any scientific article.
Reese RichardsonGUEST
34:55
So we used PubPeer comments to, uh, detail a network of more than 2,000 papers that all share images and thus probably all come from the same place.
Theo BakerGUEST
28:15
And then this is when colleagues say that, you know, as he begins to segue into positions of higher and higher acclaim, in the words of one, he becomes sort of royal, hands-off, distant from the day-to-day, that his lab culture begins to change, and this is when the problems begin to seep in.
Theo BakerGUEST
28:30
Of course, you know, th- these papers, some of which were published before I was even born, right, questions about some of these had existed on an anonymous forum called PubPeer going back to 2015, so seven years before I showed up on the story, and Marc Tessier-Lavigne had never publicly responded, and the journals had not corrected or retracted these papers.
Theo BakerGUEST
28:50
And the institution, Stanford, made him president in 2016, so he went through the vetting process, and these questions clearly were not fully addressed at that time.
Oz WoloshynHOST
29:04
All right, quick switch because I want to tell you about one of our favorite sponsors, Vital Proteins.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.