Johns Hopkins University Press

An international conference met in January 1926 to discuss this problem.

See discussion in American Relations with China, John Hopkins Press, 1925, page 49.

End footnote.

One other important provision of the peace settlement was that British goods imported into China would no longer be subject to arbitrary exactions, but to a fixed customs tariff, the rate of which was later settled at 5% ad valorem.

An international conference met in January 1926 to discuss this problem.

See discussion in American Relations with China, John Hopkins Press, 1925, page 49.

End footnote.

One other important provision of the peace settlement was that British goods imported into China would no longer be subject to arbitrary exactions, but to a fixed customs tariff, the rate of which was later settled at five percent ad valorem.

An international conference met in January 1926 to discuss this problem.

See discussion in American Relations with China, John Hopkins Press, 1925, page 49.

End footnote.

One other important provision of the peace settlement was that British goods imported into China would no longer be subject to arbitrary exactions, but to a fixed customs tariff, the rate of which was later settled at 5% ad valorem.

An international conference met in January 1926 to discuss this problem.

See discussion in American Relations with China, John Hopkins Press, 1925, page 49.

End footnote.

One other important provision of the peace settlement was that British goods imported into China would no longer be subject to arbitrary exactions, but to a fixed customs tariff, the rate of which was later settled at 5% ad valorem.

An international conference met in January 1926 to discuss this problem.

See discussion in American Relations with China, John Hopkins Press, 1925, page 49.

End footnote.

One other important provision of the peace settlement was that British goods imported into China would no longer be subject to arbitrary exactions, but to a fixed customs tariff, the rate of which was later settled at 5% ad valorem.

My name is Dr. Charlotte Huntley, an epidemiologist and entrepreneur who has spent over two decades working at the intersection of health, community, and meaningful change.

I'm also the author of The Public Health Consultant, Expertise, Entrepreneurship, Greater Impact, publishing December 2026 with Johns Hopkins University Press.

Through my consulting firm, Dr. C.H. Huntley, LLC, I partner with large nonprofits, government agencies, and tribal nations on strategic planning and implementation, helping organizations turn health information into meaningful action in the communities they serve.

A significant focus of our work right now is workforce development, and we approach it the same way we approach all of our strategic planning work, by listening deeply and analyzing carefully, and building plans that actually get put into action.

An international conference met in January 1926 to discuss this problem.

See discussion in American Relations with China, John Hopkins Press, 1925, page 49.

End footnote.

One other important provision of the peace settlement was that British goods imported into China would no longer be subject to arbitrary exactions, but to a fixed customs tariff, the rate of which was later settled at 5% ad valorem.