Fars News Agency

The Revolutionary Guards Navy said the strait remained closed.

Fars, a news agency affiliated with the Guards, reported that Iranian forces targeted 19 vessels described as violators over Friday and Saturday, 12 on Friday evening and 7 on Saturday evening, and cited local reports of Iranian cruise missiles and attack drones launched toward commercial ships south of the strait.

The United States had not responded, and there was no independent confirmation.

Separately, Iran's Persian Gulf Strait Authority warned that charterers who forced ships through without required procedures could be placed on a noncompliance list.

And the reporting here is all over the place.

And it starts to get really tricky because we have Gregory Brew, a senior Iran analyst at the Eurasia Group, just said that Iranian Fars News is claiming 19 ships were struck in the Strait of Hormuz over the last two days.

He says very likely an exaggeration, though the level of activity last night was very high and at least a few vessels were struck.

He put this out yesterday, so he was talking about the activity on Saturday night.

As we can see, Iran says it struck 19 ships in the Strait of Hormuz over the past two nights.

Fars News Agency reported Sunday after there were more reports of over 20 million barrels of crude and products exiting the blockade line as a seven-day average.

Iranian forces hit 12 vessels Friday night and seven more Saturday night after they tried to pass through unauthorized routes, according to Fars.

Iranian officials said that any ship crossing without Iranian authorization will face an armed response.

Since this happened, though, and this is kind of the important point, we have this.

Iran says it struck 19 ships in the Strait of Hormuz over the past two nights, Fars News Agency reported Sunday.

It's also been reported over 20 million barrels of crude and products exiting the U.S. blockade line as a seven-day average.

Iranian forces hit 12 vessels Friday night.

And Secretary of State Marco Rubio's comments come after the US and Iran held their first indirect talks in months on the UN sidelines.

This morning, an advisor to Iran's supreme leader tells the semi-official Fars News Agency that the war could expand to the Indian Ocean if the US or Israel resume attacks.

A federal judge has ordered the Trump administration to temporarily lift a ban on journalists from CNN, MS Now, and Politico from the White House.

The ruling is an early victory for the news outlets in their lawsuit, which accuses President Trump and senior officials of a direct assault on their First Amendment rights.

Either we build it together or we'll have to live under insecurity together." Which seemed to say, we'll talk, but if you go back to war, we'll set fire to the region.

And the reason I'm picking that out is because there is a line from one of, uh, Supreme Leader Mustafa Khamenei's advisors out of Tehran just this morning where he said, "Since the conflict has spread from the Persian Gulf, from the Strait of Hormuz to the Red Sea, it's possible that in response to more war, the front will expand even further, reaching the Indian Ocean and perhaps beyond." That's Yahya Rahim Safavi in a video released by the Fars News Agency this morning.

So it's difficult to tell, isn't it? I mean, I was wondering if you were able to pick up any vibes from the diplomats milling around.

Does this mean Iran is planning to go back to war, or does it mean that they are, they're hurting really badly and they, they want the negotiations to work?

There were those reports as well, right? The Japanese reports and the Reuters reports claiming that Iran said, like, if you lift the siege and stop your aggression, like, we will open it in seven days.

And then recently, Fars News and other Iranian sources said this is not true.

So basically where we're at is that Iran has not budged on its demands or conceded.

I think the contrary.