Eucerin

I know.

And this is interesting because you see, they have named it, I think, Tiamidol in Eucerin and Luminous 630 in Nivea.

So this is, I would say, good marketing because they have one patented ingredient that happens to be the same, but in different name for different brands.

And so they are building this more and more.

Texture is heavier, finish is semi-occlusive, best for dry skin types or nighttime use when you don't care about looking dewy.

These mirror the formulation structure of basic Eucerin or Nivea creams.

Simple, functional, unglamorous.

Gel-based cleansers and moisturizers use carbomer or other gelling agents to create that bouncy texture, usually lighter in emollients, heavier in humectants, better for oily or combination skin.

But then also you'll see it in much lower concentrations and it's a really effective humectant.

For example, Eucerin is really big on urea.

They have...

I forget what the line is called, but it's got like purple on it.

And then Neutrogena has a really nice tinted skincare line.

The Eucerin sunscreens have come a long way.

So like, honestly, every budget can find a good sunscreen nowadays, which I think is great.

Speaking of, when you said the zinc, it reminded me, where are we falling with mineral versus chemical sunscreen? Does it matter? Do we care? Is it, I mean, most important that you use one, but if we take it one step further, like which one do we care more about?