Environmental Health Trust

Yeah.

So it's very interesting because the Environmental Health Trust, which is another NGO that works in this space, has actually information on the link between breast cancer and phones in the bra on their website to where they have documented cases where the tumor pretty much developed exactly where the cell phone is sitting over a prolonged period of time.

We see women with colon cancer, increasing colon cancer from wearing the phone in the back pocket.

We see, you know, as I mentioned, a drop in male fertility.

We're not going to do anything.

Children's Health Defense and Environmental Health Trust and some other petitioners filed for review at the D.C.

Circuit.

And the D.C.

OK.

During that five years, we went to the commission several times.

Environmental Health Trust did.

We did.

There are organizations.

I'm in one called Environmental Health Trust.

I'm the Vice President for Scientific Research and Clinical Affairs for Environmental Health Trust.

It's a really great organization that's done a lot of work.

It was founded by Deborah Davis, who has a PhD in epidemiology and public health.

Section seven oh four of the Telecommunications Act of nineteen ninety-six blocks state and local governments from denying cell tower or wireless facility permits based on the environmental or health effects of radio frequency emissions, provided the facility complies with Federal Communications Commission guidelines.

In twenty twenty-one, the Environmental Health Trust won in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit after the Court of Appeals ruled in the historic case EHT et al versus the FCC, that the December twenty nineteen decision by the FCC to retain its nineteen ninety-six safety limits for human exposure to wireless radiation was arbitrary and capricious.

According to the Environmental Health Trust, the court held that the FCC failed to respond to record evidence that exposure to RF radiation at levels below the commission's current limits may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer.

Further, the agency demonstrated a complete failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation.

The court found the FCC ignored numerous organizations, scientists, and medical doctors who called on them to update limits, and the court found the FCC failed to address these issues: impacts of long-term wireless exposure, impacts to children, the testimony of people injured by wireless radiation, impacts to wildlife and the environment, impacts to the developing brain and reproduction.

The FCC's request is more narrowly focused.

It seeks comments on RF exposures returned to the agency for further consideration by the appeals court in Environmental Health Trust versus the FCC.

Its commitment deadline is October twenty-second.

After years of seeking meaningful federal attention, electrosentients and advocates now face two simultaneous invitations to supply evidence, describe their concerns, and invest their time.

So today we're doing part two with the magnificent Rob Brown, MD, who is an author of Unplug: Why and How to Prevent the Damage Caused by Electropollution.

He is vice president of Scientific Research and Clinical Affairs, and he comes to the Environmental Health Trust with over 30 years of experience as a board-certified diagnostic radiologist with a sub-specialization in muscu- musculoskeletal [laughs] imaging.

I hope I pronounced that correctly.

He is a fellow of American Academy of Radiology with extensive clinical background spanning renowned institutions like the Cleveland Clinic and the New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases.